Scappoose Urban Growth Boundary Expansion
“Wow, I just read thru the full LCDC response and I am elated with their replies to all of the objections. A toast to all of you for your hard work on this project!”
Four years after LCDC’s acknowledgement of Scappoose’s Urban Growth Boundary amendment, the Court of Appeals affirms LCDC’s decision.
“We conclude that LCDC’s interpretation of the rules is plausible, and that LCDC adequately explained both why the UGB amendment was justifiable under those rules and how it applied its own substantial evidence standard of review. Accordingly, we affirm the order under review.” (Zimmerman v. LCDC, 274 Or App 512 (2015))